Basic protection: permanent & free.Activate free basic protection now
Type of similarity 3 of 4

Combination of word elements

Sometimes it's not the whole name that is copied but a distinctive element that is taken over, rearranged or supplemented. This too can be confusingly similar – especially with memorable word elements.

When building blocks migrate

This type of similarity covers cases where a new sign uses parts of your trademark: by rearranging ("TechVision" → "VisionTech"), by adding ("GreenEnergy" → "GreenPowerEnergy") or by taking over a distinctive word beginning. Consumers react strongly to familiar elements in a name – a single familiar building block can already create a mental association.

Trademark family

A prefix as a protection anchor

Those who build a whole "family" of trademarks with the same element can protect that element in a special way. The best-known example is McDonald's "Mc" family – new "Mc" names quickly come into conflict.

Example

This is an alert for word elements

Well-known cases

"Big Mac"vs"Supermac's"
long dispute

McDonald's saw a likelihood of confusion in the element "Mac" and blocked the expansion of the Irish chain Supermac's. In 2024 the EU court restricted Big Mac protection for lack of proof of use.

The lesson: Well-known word elements are powerful – but their use must also be proven.

EU General Court, T-58/23, 2024

The case in detail

Why it's hard to find yourself

Such combinations almost always escape a simple name search – the signs are neither identical nor spelled the same. It takes an analysis that recognises distinctive elements and also checks their rearrangements and additions. That depth is what our Pro plan offers.

Keep word elements in view

Pro also detects combined and rearranged word elements. Start for free – upgrade to Pro anytime.

This article is for information and does not constitute legal advice.